Monday, December 30, 2019

Corporate Trash At Instagram Enabling Sexual Predators While Banning Victims

My OpEd: What does this have to do with treasonous criminal Donald Trump? You may may be asking. As you may or may not know, society, the criminal justice system, and corporate run social media has rules for us peasants while members of the ruling class are exempt from all rules including the rule of law. As most people know, Trump, scumbag that he is, violates rules on Twitter with every lie filled tweet yet Twitter allows him to post lie after lie after lie. There was a time when this sort of fuckery wouldn't be happening because somebody would show up at 181 South Park Street Suite 2 San Francisco, CA 94107 United States, San Francisco, CA Instagram head quarters and beat the shit out of the gangsters responsible or vandalize their BMWs or pie them in the face with a shit pies for this sort of fuckery. Instagram Customer Service Support Phone No – 1-415-857-3369.


See the source image


Social media corporations are disgraceful. They censor anonymously. They offer no appeals process. They sic their own trolls onto targets. They take money from Russian trolls. If this sort of treachery existed during the time of the French Revolution Robespierre would have executed every last one of them. Billionaire Kevin Systrom the piece of shit billionaire CEO running Instagram.



She Reported Her Sexual Harasser To Instagram. It Banned Her Instead.

After calling out a harasser on her Instagram page, Venus Libido was told she was the one who'd violated the platform's rules. (Photo: Courtesy of Venus Libido)
After calling out a harasser on her Instagram page, Venus Libido was told she was the one who'd violated the platform's rules. (Photo: Courtesy of Venus Libido)
British influencer and illustrator Venus Libido was at home in Southampton recovering from a recent surgery when the notifications popped up on her phone. In private messages to her 128,000-follower Instagram account, a stranger had sent her two photos of his penis, along with the text “enjoy the view.”
It was the afternoon of Dec. 16 and Venus, who uses a pseudonym to protect her identity, closed the app in disgust. If she ignored him, she figured, he would probably go away. But moments later, another message appeared: “bitch i know you read it say something.”
As an outspoken feminist and mental health advocate, Venus decided to post screenshots of the man’s messages on her Instagram Story and page (censoring his genitals and username) to call attention to the kind of harassment women endure daily on the platform. She also blocked and reported him to Instagram. It wasn’t long before he contacted her from two newly created accounts to threaten and verbally abuse her.
“WTF take that down bict [sic],” he wrote. “My fucking girl could see this … your done!!”
So Venus reported him again. A short time later, Instagram — which rolled out a new anti-bullying initiative that same day — told her the man had not violated its user guidelines, and his account would remain intact. In fact, it was Venus who’d broken the rules, according to the next alert she received. Instagram removed her post without specifying which policy it had violated, an action the company would later claim was taken in error.
“That really angered me,” Venus recalled. She then posted a piece of her artwork on her page with a caption describing the situation and criticizing Instagram for declining to take action against her harasser. Minutes later, as comments were flooding in from other people describing their similar experiences on the app, Instagram shut down her account altogether. My OpEd: The scumbag who sent her the dick picture was probably Instagram's CEO Kevin Systrom. The reason I say this is because Systrom knows this what happened and he could have her account restored in minutes and have the guy who sent her the dick pictures found and arrested.
After Venus called out Instagram for punishing her instead of her abuser, Instagram deleted her account. (Photo: Instagram/VenusLibido)
After Venus called out Instagram for punishing her instead of her abuser, Instagram deleted her account. (Photo: Instagram/VenusLibido)
Social media sites are shielded from liability for user-generated content, meaning they’re free to decide who and what is allowed on their platforms. By choosing to silence victims and protect abusers, Instagram is not only tolerating harassment — it’s encouraging it. 
Venus’ case isn’t an isolated occurrence. In July, when accusations of sexual misconduct started to pour in against disgraced celebrity photographers Marcus Hyde and Timur Emek, a number of models used Instagram to speak out about their own alleged experiences with the two men.
Instagram reportedly disabled the account belonging to photographer and art director Haley Bowman after she used it to accuse Emek of assaulting her when she was a teenager. Upon regaining access to her page, Bowman said she felt as if she was “being punished for calling out a rapist,” according to Screen Shot Magazine.
Similarly, after model Sunnaya Nash posted screenshots purporting to show Hyde asking her for nude photos of herself in exchange for a free photo shoot, Instagram took down the posts and threatened to delete Nash’s account. 
Instagram, which eventually removed Hyde and Emek’s accounts as the allegations continued to surface, later claimed that the deletion of Nash’s content “was a mistake obviously.”
Venus received a similar explanation from the company, but she doesn’t buy it.
“I felt like I was being silenced for calling out an issue Instagram wasn’t addressing,” she said of her own account’s closure. “I’ve built my account up over two years, and it felt like it was being ripped away from me for speaking out.”
Like many content creators, Venus uses Instagram as a digital portfolio where she promotes her work to a wide audience. Being kicked off the billion-user site threatened to jeopardize her livelihood, so she appealed the deletion through the app and contacted an Instagram representative directly.
After several anxious hours, Venus’ account was reinstated. Not long after she’d logged back in the next morning — her 28th birthday — her harasser sent her yet another photo of his penis with the message: “I hope that teached you a lesson getting your account removed!!”
Venus' harasser has sent her unsolicited photos of his genitals from multiple Instagram accounts. This image was blurred by HuffPost. (Photo: Courtesy of Venus Libido)
Venus' harasser has sent her unsolicited photos of his genitals from multiple Instagram accounts. This image was blurred by HuffPost. (Photo: Courtesy of Venus Libido)
Venus blocked the man yet again, but that didn’t stop him from creating one new account after another to continue his campaign of abuse. Later in the day, he sent her a full-body nude and another stream of messages:
“ur boring”
“oh and a dumb slut” 
“if i gave u my real instagram would you not expose me and just write me a message?”
After being contacted by HuffPost, a spokesperson for Facebook, which owns Instagram, said that it has taken action to ban the man from its platform, and that it had mistakenly removed Venus’ content and account.
“@venuslibido didn’t violate our policies and we apologize for the mistakes we made when reviewing content on her account,” the spokesperson said. “We have taken steps to stop the individual harassing @venuslibido from returning to Instagram.”
Venus sees a pattern. Instagram is notorious for censoringshadow banning and silencing women, she noted. And although the company claims her original post was removed in error, it still hasn’t been restored.
“How is it that Instagram cracks down so hard on things like female nipples, but they’ll continue to let a man send me photos of his genitals even after I’ve reported him over and over again?” Venus asked, referring to Instagram’s ban on posts that show women’s nipples.
Since the scare of having her account deleted, several people have suggested that Venus keep her head down and stay quiet to reduce the risk of being deplatformed again, she said. But she refuses to self-censor.
“I have a chance to use my voice and my platform for good,” she said. “I don’t care if I get removed again. I’ll just keep fighting it because this is wrong, and if I don’t say something, then what am I doing?”
Related...
This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

Lindsey Graham Suspicious Giuliani's Ukraine Information May Be Russian Propaganda

See the source image
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested in an interview Sunday that the information Rudy Giuliani claimed he gathered on Ukraine and Joe Biden may be Russian propaganda.
Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, returned last month from a trip to Kyiv with what he characterized as damaging findings.  He has yet to reveal any facts.
“My advice to Giuliani would be to share what he got from Ukraine with the IC [intelligence community] to make sure it’s not Russia propaganda,” Graham warned in an interview with The Daily Beast. “I’m very suspicious of what the Russians are up to all over the world.” 
The senator noted that Giuliani has not shared any of the information with him. 
Earlier this month Graham invited Giuliani to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he chairs, to vet his unsupported claims that former Vice President Joe Biden helped his son Hunter get a spot on the board of a Ukraine energy company.
Giuliani and Trump have also both pushed the debunked claim that it was Ukraine, not the Kremlin, that interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Graham, agreeing with the American intelligence community, has said he is “1000% confident” it was Russia — not Ukraine — that meddled in the election.
Graham’s indication that Giuliani’s information could be Russian propaganda is surprising given that the senator has already launched an investigation into the Bidens.
Graham has also defended Trump’s call to Ukraine pressuring President Volodymyr Zelensky to probe the Bidens — while Trump was withholding military funds. Though the call triggered Trump’s impeachment, #LeningradLindsey Graham is insisting the call was not cause for impeachment. But at the same time, he has also conceded that the “Trump policy toward Ukraine ... was incoherent.”
Graham isn’t the only senator trying to put daylight between himself and Giuliani ahead of the impeachment trial. The Daily Beast reports that senators are avoiding meeting with Giuliani in part because they fear he’ll peddle Kremlin conspiracy theories as fact, according to several sources.
“Rudy Giuliani long ago lost any shred of credibility, especially after the dossier he assembled for the State Department stunningly mirrored Russian propaganda,” Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) told the Beast.
Giuliani has insisted his information is not Kremlin propaganda.

Sunday, December 29, 2019

Girls Talk: An Ode To Michael Cohen



All the girls like Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs, Sean Hannity, Mark Dice, Alex Jones, Laura Ingraham, Jeanine Pirro and Trump all have had something to say about Trump's fixer Michael Cohen. These cunts ran their lie holes for months. Cohen decided to tell the truth when he had no other choice. Either way Cohen is fucked. His life is over. Everything he loved is gone. He got mixed up with Satan and now he's fucked!

The Treasonous Corporate Trash At Youtube Is Waging War On The First Amendment

The YouTube Exodus Continues First Amendment Activists Targeted

Alternatives to Youtube

Youtube is rapidly turning to shit because of the censorship and the Youtube allowing and promoting lie filled propaganda. Corporate thugs ruin everything. Let's all send cancer karma to the Youtube brass that they may die agonizing deaths and burn in hell.

Saturday, December 28, 2019

Truth Is Not Truth!




Is Trump losing support among evangelicals? Probably not, Most Evangelicals Are the Scum of the Earth

See the source image
What’s happening 
Christianity Today, a prominent evangelical magazine, published an editorial last week arguing that President Trump should be removed from office. In the column, the publication’s editor in chief, Mark Galli, wrote that Trump is a man of “grossly immoral character” who puts the country in “moral and political danger.”
The editorial received harsh criticism from prominent evangelical leaders. Franklin Graham, whose father, the late Rev. Billy Graham, founded Christianity Today, accused the magazine of a “totally partisan attack” against Trump. Nearly 200 evangelical leaders signed a letter that accused Galli of impugning the “spiritual integrity” of their followers. An editor for one of Christianity Today’s competitors, Christian Post, resigned over an editorial criticizing Galli that he said put the publication on “team Trump.”
See the source image
Trump has historically garnered strong support from evangelicals, a subset of conservative Christianity often emphasizing the principle of being “born again” into the faith. He received 81 percent of the white evangelical vote in the 2016 presidential election, according to exit polls. This backing has come despite Trump’s personal profile — multiple divorces, accusations of adultery and sexual assault, a proclivity for vulgar language — which is seen as running antithetical to the moral focus of the evangelical faith. 
In the late 1970s, evangelical leaders rallied around Ronald Reagan, helping him ascend to the presidency in 1980. The group has been a powerful force in conservative politics ever since. 
Why there’s debate
Some observers see the Christianity Today editorial as a sign that Trump’s grip on evangelicals may be slipping. The magazine’s editors reported receiving countless messages from readers who “no longer feel alone” in their reluctance to support the president.
Other recent indicators add to that narrative. Influential televangelist Pat Robertson criticized Trump’s decision to allow Turkey to invade parts of northern Syria in October. A recent Fox News poll found that 28 percent of white evangelicals believe the president should be impeached and removed from office. While it’s unlikely conservative Christians would vote for a Democrat in 2020, muted enthusiasm for Trump could prompt some members of this crucial voting bloc to stay home on Election Day, some argue. 
Others have cautioned against overstating any perceived decline in evangelical support for Trump, which some argue has in fact increased since 2016. Despite behavior that many members find objectionable, Trump has delivered on a number of issues that are at the top of evangelicals’ political wish list, including appointing conservative judges, siding with Christians in “religious liberty” disputes and restricting abortion access.
See the source image
Some experts argue that evangelical support for Trump isn’t subject to the same sort of calculus as typical partisan matters, since backing the president has itself become a matter of faith to many followers.
What’s next
The president’s reelection campaign announced the creation of the “Evangelicals for Trump” coalition late last week. The group will be formally unveiled at a rally in Miami in early January.

Perspectives

Whether it’s faith or politics, evangelicals won’t give up on Trump
“Mr. Trump’s evangelical defenders may truly believe he is anointed, or they may just relish the unparalleled authority he has granted them. Either way, this actual mainstream of American evangelicalism is not likely to give up on its divine leader, or on its newfound power, no matter what the impeachment proceedings uncover.” — Sarah Posner, New York Times
The public conversation ignores large numbers of politically inactive evangelicals
“There are likely tens of millions of politically inactive evangelicals in America. These people may be as regular churchgoers as many evangelical Trump supporters, but in most stories about evangelicals, nonvoters might as well not exist.” — Thomas S. Kidd, Dallas Morning News
Trump has given evangelicals the policies they want
“Although evangelicals preach family values and often claim moral superiority, history reveals that they are most interested in exercising political power and identifying politicians who help them do it. Evangelical leaders are sophisticated and pragmatic: Policy outcomes are what they really care about.” — Matthew Avery Sutton, Washington Post
Support for Trump may harm evangelical influence in the future
“Has this generation of largely white male evangelical pastors and personalities destroyed their credibility by attaching themselves to Trump? Have they driven away a generation of young parishioners watching them all bathe in hypocrisy as what they teach in the pulpit is not what they practice in the public policy arena? I think the answer is a resounding ... yes!” — Sophia A. Nelson, USA Today
To some evangelicals, Trump’s brashness is a bonus
“Whatever Trump’s moral failings, he’s a street fighter suited for an era of political combat. Christian conservatives believe — rightly or wrongly — that they’ve been held back by their sense of righteousness, grace, and gentility, with disastrous results. Trump operates without restraint. He is the enemy they believe the secular deserve, and perhaps unfortunately, the champion they need.” — Ezra Klein, Vox
Evangelicals are more loyal to the conservative movement than Trump himself
“My gut says white evangelicals will jump when and if Fox News does. Any movement, if we see it, isn’t going to come from within their religious communities.” — American religion expert Elesha Coffman to Politico
Trump’s backing among evangelicals has grown since 2016
“Whatever reservations they may have had about Trump when he first ran for office have apparently been soothed, either by his full-throated defense of his supporters’ priorities or because these voters resent what they see as unrelenting attacks against him and his administration.” — Emma Green, Atlantic
Squabbling among high-profile leaders doesn’t represent the views of evangelical voters
“There’s a difference between a sphere of evangelical leaders and their organizations — the Tony Perkins, the Franklin Grahams of the world — and the evangelical base, the folks that voted for Donald Trump in 2016.” — Christian Broadcasting Network political analyst David Brody to NPR
Is there a topic you’d like to see covered in “The 360”? Send your suggestions to the360@yahoonews.com.

Read more “360s”

Democracies Worldwide Should Execute Trump Trolls and Putin Trolls

 Trump trolls and Putin trolls are committing espionage and therefore they can be treated as spies and executed under the law. When the spre...