Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Veterans Group Rips ‘Traitor’ Trump Over Russian Bounties To Kill U.S. Soldiers


A group of veterans opposed to President Donald Trump released a new video calling him out over reports that the U.S. government knew the Russian military paid bounties to Afghan militants for killing American soldiers.
On Friday, The New York Times reported that Trump was briefed on the situation in March, but took no action against Russia. To the contrary, Trump said he would like to invite Russian President Vladimir Putin to the next G-7 meeting in September.
Trump said on Twitter that he was not briefed about the alleged bounties, called the Times “fake news” and claimed “nobody’s been tougher on Russia” than his administration.
VoteVets ripped into him.
“Putin owns Donald Trump,” the organization wrote on Twitter, along with the #TRE45SON hashtag that went viral over the weekend. The group also released a new video:


“Intelligence reports on his desk. He says nothing to his master. Takes no action to protect us,” the voiceover stated. “If you’re going to act like a traitor, you don’t get to thank us for our service.”
This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

Fauci says US death toll 'going to be very disturbing' and fears 100,000 daily cases

The top US infectious disease expert Dr Anthony Fauci said the country could see 100,000 new coronavirus cases daily unless action is taken to reverse the epidemic.
Appearing before the Senate health, education, labor and pensions committee on Tuesday, Fauci warned that the US is “going in the wrong direction” over handling the coronavirus, and said the death toll “is going to be very disturbing”.
He appeared a day after the White House insisted the outbreak had been reduced to “embers” but the principal deputy director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr Anne Schuchat, insisted: “This is really the beginning.
Speaking on Capitol Hill, Fauci was asked about the increase in new cases of coronavirus – the US last week reported 40,000 in one day – and whether the pandemic was under control.
“The numbers speak for themselves,” he said. “I’m very concerned, I’m not satisfied with what’s going on, because we’re going in the wrong direction.
“Clearly we’re not in total control.”
Fauci said that without a more robust response, the daily number of cases could more than double.
“I would not be surprised if we go up to 100,000 a day if this does not turn around,” he said.
Fauci said he could not provide an estimated death toll, but said: “It is going to be very disturbing, I guarantee you that.”
The stark warning came after Schuchat told the Journal of the American Medical Association: “What we hope is that we can take it seriously and slow the transmission. We have way too much virus across the country for that right now, so it’s very discouraging.”
The US represents 4% of the world’s population, but accounts for 25% of all cases and deaths from Covid-19. The US has recorded more than 2.5m cases, with some states seeing record rises.
On Monday, the governor of Arizona ordered bars, movie theaters, gyms and water parks to shut down for a month, weeks after reopening. Texas, Florida and California, all seeing rises in cases, have rolled back reopening efforts. Oregon and Kansas have ordered people to wear masks in public.
Responding to widely shared images of people not following guidelines – including not wearing a mask and gathering in large groups – Fauci said better messaging was required.
“What we saw were a lot of people who maybe felt because they think they are invulnerable – and we know many young people are not because they’re getting serious disease – that therefore their getting infected has nothing to do with anyone else,” he said
“When in fact it does, because if a person gets infected they may not be symptomatic but they could pass it to someone else, who passes it to someone else, who then makes someone’s grandmother, grandfather, sick uncle or leukaemic child on chemotherapy, get sick and die.”
Fauci said: “We’ve got to get that message out that we are all in this together and if we’re going to contain this, we’ve gotta contain it together.”
New daily cases are rising in 38 states, according to NPR’s pandemic tracker, but the White House continues its attempts to downplay the severity of Covid-19. At a briefing on Monday, press secretary Kayleigh McEnany ignored the surge.
“The people who are being infected tend to be those – as Vice-President Pence has noted – half of those testing positive are under the age of 35. This means we’re catching people in their communities,” she said.
She added: “We’re aware that there are embers that need to be put out.”
Fauci said on Sunday the US was unlikely to achieve herd immunity to the coronavirus even with a vaccine, given a third of Americans say they would not receive it.
“There is a general anti-science, anti-authority, anti-vaccine feeling among some people in this country – an alarmingly large percentage of people, relatively speaking,” Fauci said, adding that the government has “a lot of work to do” to educate people about vaccines.
Even states where the rate of new infections has decreased are rethinking plans to allow businesses to reopen. New Jersey has postponed plans to allow indoor dining, while the governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, said he may reverse plans to allow restaurants and bars to reopen.
Broadway theaters will remain closed until January 2021, an industry group said on Monday. Theaters had planned to reopen in September.
People in the US are expected to be barred from non-essential travel to the EU when it releases a “safe list” of countries on Tuesday. Russia and Brazil, each experiencing rising coronavirus cases, are among the other countries to be excluded from the list.

Trump Knew Of Putin's Bounty On American Troops

See the source image

Private calls between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin have the tone of "two guys in a steam bath" according to an aide's account of the conversations described to CNN.

The US president is often ousmarted by his Russian counterart, according to the aide's summary.
It comes amid concerns that the Trump administration did not act on reports that Russia planned on paying Taliban bounties to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan.
Mr Trump dismissed those claims as “another fabricated Russia Hoax, maybe by the Fake News”.
Russian authorities added that president Putin had not discussed the claims with president Trump, and denied the Taliban plan.
“[Trump] sits there and thinks he can build himself up enough as a businessman and tough guy that Putin will respect him", one source told CNN, bemoaning how Russia’s president could “destabilise” the West whilst president Trump discussed his time in Moscow with the Miss Universe Pageant.
Sources alleged that Mr Trump also trashed previous US presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, and touted his own successes as president, on the phone.
Mr Trump was almost never prepared for phone calls with his Russian and Turkish counterparts, said the CNN source.
Two high-level sources within the Trump administration told CNN that Mr Trump had both pandered to Mr Putin, whilst undermining US Congress, US intelligence and US relations with its European allies.
"He [Trump] gives away the advantage that was hard won in the Cold War, by giving Putin and Russia a legitimacy they never had," said another source. "He's given Russia a lifeline — because there is no doubt that they're a declining power”.
“He's playing with something he doesn't understand and he's giving them power that they would use [aggressively]", added the source.
The phone calls led two US intelligence personnel and ex-Trump advisors, including John Bolton, James Mattis, and John Kelly, to conclude that the US president was "delusional," as two sources put it.

Read more

Sunday, June 28, 2020

Older Republican Voters Abandon Trump

Clifford Wagner, an 80-year-old Republican in Tucson, Arizona, never cared for President Donald Trump.
He supported Jeb Bush in the 2016 presidential primary race and cast a protest vote in the general election for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian nominee. An Air Force veteran, Wagner described the Trump presidency as a mortifying experience: His friends in Europe and Japan tell him the United States has become “the laughingstock of the world.”
This year, Wagner said he would register his opposition to Trump more emphatically than he did in 2016. He plans to vote for Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, and hopes the election is a ruinous one for the Republican Party.
“I’m a Christian, and I do not believe in the hateful, racist, bigoted speech that the president uses,” Wagner said, adding, “As much as I never thought I’d say this, I hope we get a Democratic president, a Democratic-controlled Senate and maintain a Democratic-controlled House.”
Wagner is part of one of the most important maverick voting groups in the 2020 general election: conservative-leaning seniors who have soured on the Republican Party over the past four years.
Republican presidential candidates typically carry older voters by solid margins, and in his first campaign Trump bested Hillary Clinton by 7 percentage points with voters over 65. He won white seniors by nearly triple that margin.
Today, Trump and Biden are tied among seniors, according to a poll of registered voters conducted by The New York Times and Siena College. And in the six most important battleground states, Biden has established a clear upper hand, leading Trump by 6 percentage points among the oldest voters and nearly matching the president’s support among whites in that age group.
That is no small advantage for Biden, the former vice president, given the prevalence of retirement communities in a few of those crucial states, including Arizona and Florida.
No Democrat has won or broken even with seniors in two decades, since Al Gore in 2000 devoted much of his general election campaign to warning that Republicans would cut popular programs like Social Security and Medicare. In 2016, Trump, now 74, seemed in some ways keenly attuned to the political sensitivities of voters in his own age group. As a candidate, he bluntly rejected his party’s long-standing interest in restructuring government guarantees of retirement security.
But Trump’s presidency has been a trying experience for many of these voters, some of whom are now so frustrated and disillusioned that they are preparing to take the drastic step of supporting a Democrat.
The grievances of these defecting seniors are familiar, most or all of them shared by their younger peers. But these voters often express themselves with a particularly sharp kind of dismay and disappointment. They see Trump as coarse and disrespectful, divisive to his core and failing persistently to comport himself with the dignity of the other presidents that they have observed for more than half a century. The Times poll also found that most seniors disapproved of Trump’s handling of race relations and the protests after the death of George Floyd.
And as the coronavirus pandemic continues to sweep the country, putting older Americans at particular risk, these voters feel a special kind of frustration and betrayal with Trump’s ineffective leadership and often-blasé public comments about the crisis.
The president has urged the country to return to life-as-usual far more quickly than the top public health officials in his own administration have recommended. Some prominent Republican officials and conservative pundits have even suggested at times that older people should be willing to risk their own health for the sake of a quicker resumption of the business cycle.
In The Times poll, seniors in the battleground states disapproved of Trump’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic by 7 points, 52% to 45%. By a 26-point margin, this group said the federal government should prioritize containing the pandemic over reopening the economy.
Former Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida, a 40-year-old Republican deeply versed in the politics of the retiree-rich swing state, said many seniors were disturbed by important aspects of Trump’s record and found Biden a mild and respectable alternative who did not inspire the same antipathy on the right that Clinton did in 2016.
Regarded by much of his own party as bland and conventional, Biden’s nostalgia-cloaked candidacy may be uniquely equipped to ease a sizable group of right-of-center seniors into the Democratic column, at least for one election.
“He’s not ever been known to be a radical or an extreme leftist or liberal, so there is certainly a degree of comfort there,” Curbelo said. He added: “This public health crisis is so threatening, especially to seniors, and because the president hasn’t earned high marks in his handling of it, I think that has also been a factor in Biden’s improving numbers.”
Biden and his allies have expressed growing excitement about the political possibilities that the shifting senior vote could create in the fall. That is true not only in Sun Belt retirement havens but also in Midwestern states where Biden is currently running well ahead of Clinton’s 2016 performance with a range of conservative-leaning constituencies, including older white people.
In Iowa, former Gov. Tom Vilsack, a close Biden ally, said the former vice president had closed a substantial deficit in the state through his response to the coronavirus, his connection with older rural voters and his ability to empathize.
“Part of it is the demeanor he has projected during the course of this pandemic,” Vilsack said, before acknowledging, “As much as Joe’s doing, it’s probably as much or more what the president has done or failed to do.”
He cited an ad from a group of anti-Trump Republicans that cast Trump’s approach to crisis as erratic and selfish, unlike past presidents who have confronted national tragedies like the Challenger disaster and the Oklahoma City bombing.
“Each of those presidents was able to connect emotionally to the feelings of the nation,” Vilsack said. “This president has had a really, really hard time doing that.”
Trump’s ineffective response to the coronavirus weighed on the thinking of many older voters surveyed in the poll, including Patrick Mallon, 73, a retired information technology specialist in Battle Creek, Michigan.
Mallon said he was a registered Republican who had long been unhappy with Trump but mindful that he was presiding over a strong economy. The pandemic set Mallon firmly against Trump’s reelection.
“The main reason is Donald Trump saying, ‘Don’t wear a mask, this thing is going to go away, we can have large gatherings,’” he said. “Everything he says is incorrect and dangerous to the country.”
When young people contract the coronavirus, Mallon added, “most of them will survive, but they’re going to give it to their parents, their grandparents — and I’m sorry, we’re just as important as that younger generation is.”
The abandonment of Trump by older voters is far from universal, and he still has a strong base among older white men and self-described conservatives. Nationally, the oldest voters approve of Trump’s handling of the economy by 12 points, more than double the figure for voters of all ages.
And in the battleground states, Trump has a 10-point lead over Biden with white men over the age of 65, even as Biden has opened up an advantage with white women in the same age group. Nonwhite seniors in the battleground states currently support Biden over Trump by a huge margin, 65% to 25%.
Even among some seniors supportive of Trump, however, there is an undercurrent of unease about the way he approaches the presidency.
Karen Gamble, 65, of Reidsville, North Carolina, said that she was dissatisfied with the overall government response to the coronavirus outbreak and echoed many popular complaints about Trump’s persona. She said she wished, for instance, that Trump “wouldn’t be such a bully and would conform to being in a regal-like position, as our presidents have always been.”
Gamble said she was planning to support Trump in the election all the same, describing Biden as too old and too compromised on matters related to China. But Gamble, who said she has a “severe lung problem,” expressed hope that Trump would change his approach to the pandemic.
“We can’t blame him for this — how many presidents could really do any better than what he’s done?” Gamble said, before adding: “I just wish he wouldn’t let the country open up as much as it has. I see all these teens and young people at the beach, and I fear for them because now they’re getting sick.”
In Tucson, Gerald Lankin, a more forceful Trump supporter, said he would back the president mainly as a vote “against the Democrats.” Lankin, 77, said he found Trump’s personal manner offensive but agreed with him on most issues and saw Democrats as “much, much, much, much too far to the left.”
“He hasn’t really done anything that I can say I’m against,” Lankin said of Trump. “I think what he’s doing is the best he can. But, boy, he is tough to take. He is a tough guy to take.”
There may be time for Trump to regain his footing with seniors, along with several other right-leaning groups that have drifted away during the bleakest months of his presidency. His ability to do so could have far-reaching implications not just for his chances of winning a second term, but also his party’s ability to keep its hold on the Senate.
At the moment, Trump’s unpopularity with older voters appears to be hindering other Republicans in states including Arizona and Michigan.
Gayle Craven, 80, of High Point, North Carolina, said that while she was a registered Republican, she had not voted for Trump in 2016 and would reject him again this year. She said she saw Biden as an “honest man.”
“Trump is the biggest disappointment,” she said. “He has made America look like idiots. I think he’s an embarrassment to my country.”
Other older voters leaning toward Biden cautioned that they could still change their minds, like Frederick Monk, 73, of Mesa, Arizona, who said he had voted for Trump but quickly came to see him as “incompetent.”
Still, Monk said his mind was not fully made up. If Biden chooses an overly liberal running mate, he said he could cast a vote for Trump and hope his second term is an exercise in futility.
“Hopefully the Democrats retake the Senate and make his next four years miserable, if he lasts that long,” Monk said.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2020 The New York Times Company

Another Brutal Police Tactic

What is kettling? Here's a look into the usage and history of the controversial police tactic



Amid recent protests, some law enforcement authorities across the country have used aggressive crowd dispersal techniques and policing tactics, such as kettling — a controversial tactic where officers surround demonstrators to corral them before making arrests.
Over the past few weeks, protesters in cities around the U.S. have poured onto the streets in the wake of the killings of Black Americans — including George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery and Rayshard Brooks — to demand action on cases of police brutality and systemic racism.
With these demonstrations has come increased visibility of some forceful police practices.
Here's what you need to know about kettling.

What is 'kettling' and why is it controversial?

Kettling is a crowd-control technique used by the police. Also known as "trap and detain," it involves officers surrounding protesters to corral them before making arrests.
Some law enforcement experts argue, however, that this kind of use of force can cause tensions to rise.
According to University of Iowa sociology professor Bodi Vasi, without concerted effort, violence at protests can become self-perpetuating.
Vasi studied the role of social media in the Occupy Wall Street movement, specifically. His research found that perceptions of unjustified force used against peaceful protesters would lead to more protests — and with them, more use of force.
"The vast majority of police and protesters have good intentions," Vasi said. "It only takes a small number of people with bad intentions to create instability, which is then amplified when you don't have proper communication channels."
At a protest Monday in Des Moines, for example, witnesses and protesters say a crowd was not rowdy until police closed in on the group.
After protests in the city, activists argued that kettling infringes on First Amendment rights and is an example of police violence towards demonstrators.

What happened in Des Moines and was 'kettling' used?

During Monday protests, eyewitnesses told the Des Moines Register, part of the USA TODAY Network, that they saw police push, pepper spray, beat and arrest protesters who tried to comply with police orders.
"There are credible accounts of police action in violation of the constitutional guarantee of free speech, including 'kettling' and the use of excessive force on nonviolent protesters including a child, media and a legal observer," ACLU of Iowa Legal Director Rita Bettis Austen said in a statement.
"There was no violence from the protesters. The violence was from police only," added Sally Frank of the National Lawyers Guild, a human rights defense group. "By the time the dispersal order was audible, everyone was on the sidewalk, but police moved in.
"Some people were dispersing and were chased, and other people weren't given the opportunity, and were grabbed within seconds."
Matthew Bruce, a leader of Black Lives Matter Des Moines who led a group of 150 people in a march Monday, explained how kettling didn't allow protesters the freedom to move.
"They were literally like, 'Y'all got to get out of the street,'" Bruce said. "We said, 'Where are we supposed to go? We're surrounded.' The answer was pretty much, 'to jail.'"
Sgt. Paul Parizek, a spokesman for Des Moines police, did not directly respond to questions about protester behavior Monday night.
"Our position has been clear from the beginning," Parizek said. "Peaceful protest is welcome and supported, but disorderly conduct, disruption of peaceful neighborhoods, and destruction of property has an expiration date. It won’t be allowed to continue."

Where else has kettling been used and where did it originate?

In addition to Des Moines, kettling has recently been reported in New YorkWashington, D.C.; and other cities with protests following the Memorial Day death of George Floyd.
But the aggressive practice is nothing new. A class-action lawsuit filed in St. Louis last fall alleged that St. Louis police kettled more than 100 protesters in 2017.
According to BBC News, many believe England's 1984 Battle of Orgreave was the first example of kettling — but its roots could trace even further back.
Other legal action has been taken in recent years to combat kettling, but varying precedent makes the issue complicated.
Following the police's employment of kettling on protesters at President Donald Trump's 2017 inauguration in Washington, the American Civil Liberties Union sued D.C., Metropolitan Police Department officers and the police chief for allegedly making unconstitutional arrests and using excessive force. The case is ongoing.

Activists in recent protests raise alarm about harms of kettling during pandemic

In addition to civil rights activists, political leaders and public health officials have recently been vocal about the dangers of kettling during George Floyd protests.
On June 2, when New York protesters were trapped on Manhattan Bridge, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez D-N.Y., tweeted, "No, this is dangerous," before heading to the bridge.
Others have stressed the added harm during the time of COVID-19.
“The police tactics — the kettling, the mass arrests, the use of chemical irritants — those are completely opposed to public health recommendations,” Malika Fair, director of Public Health Initiatives at the Association of American Medical Colleges, told Politico.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Kettling explained: Police tactic used in Black Lives Matter protests

Saturday, June 27, 2020

Dangerous Russian Reddit Troll human_b4_digits

We have his primary location more intel is required. Contact Dagger 1 and red team leader.

Three possible extraction points available.


Death Deserving Trumpanzee Kicked Out of Trader Joe's For Refusing To Wear A Mask

'I have a breathing problem,' yells maskless Trader Joe's shopper who was kicked out of store in viral video


A woman shopping without a mask at a California Trader Joe's caused a scene Friday, calling employees "Democratic pigs" and screaming profanities.
Twitter user D. Giles posted several videos of the incident, which is believed to have taken place at the grocer's newest location in North Hollywood during its opening day. One of the videos went viral Saturday with more than 3.6 million views.
"That man harassed me for not wearing a mask," the woman said in the video. "I have a breathing problem, my doctor will not let me wear a mask. So anyone harassing me to wear a mask, you guys are violating federal law."
California started requiring masks or face coverings be worn inside businesses statewide June 18. Several parts of the state required masks before then.
Trader Joe's officials weren't immediately available for comment Saturday, but the grocer says on its COVID-19 update page that shoppers are asked to wear masks in stores.
"It is our preference for and we strongly encourage customers to wear a mask or face covering while shopping in all our stores," the company said. "Where face coverings are required by state or local authorities, we communicate that to our customers as well."
Many of the comments on social media about the Trader Joe's incident are similar to the responses on a viral Facebook post a maskless consumer posted earlier in the week. In a Facebook post Monday, Amber Lynn Gilles posted a photo of a barista named Lenin Gutierrez and says he refused her service for not wearing a mask.
A GoFundMe campaign for Gutierrez has grown to more than $67,000 as of Saturday afternoon.

Are masks required?

Local governments can decide what safety measures to impose on businesses and individual businesses can institute further restrictions, crisis management expert Ronn Torossian, who is at the helm of 5W Public Relations firm, told USA TODAY last month.
Just as businesses can require patrons to wear shirts, they can require them to wear a mask.

No evidence of low oxygen levels

The American Lung Association says in a June 18 blog post that "masks are designed to be breathed through and there is no evidence that low oxygen levels occur."
The association also says there is "absolutely no scientific evidence that mask wearing or physical distancing weakens the immune system," but says people with preexisting lung problems should "discuss mask wearing concerns with their health care providers."

Fake face mask exempt cards

The Americans with Disabilities Act website warns of "fraudulent facemask flyers," which include fake "face mask exempt cards," and said in an alert the "Department of Justice has been made aware of postings or flyers on the internet regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the use of face masks due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many of which include the Department of Justice’s seal."
An anti-mask group called the Freedom to Breathe Agency is believed to have created the face mask exempt cards, which claim the holder is exempt from wearing a mask. According to images of the card posted on social media, "steep penalties" are threatened if a business owner does not act accordingly.
"If found in violation of the ADA you could face steep penalties. Organizations and businesses can be fined up to $75,000 for your first violation and $150,000 for any subsequent violations," the card reads. "Denying access to your business/organization will be also reported to FTBA for further actions."
FTBA is not a state or federal agency.
"These postings were not issued by the Department and are not endorsed by the Department," the ADA says in its warning. "The Department urges the public not to rely on the information contained in these postings and to visit ADA.gov for ADA information issued by the Department."
Contributing: Dalvin Brown
Follow USA TODAY reporter Kelly Tyko on Twitter: @KellyTyko
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trader Joe's mask requirement: Woman refuses to wear mask, kicked out

Trump Knew Putin Had Bounty On U.S. Troops

'Tre45son' Trends After Bombshell Story Claiming Trump Knew Putin Had Bounty On U.S. Troops



Critics erupted Saturday after an explosive New York Times story asserting that Russian President Vladimir Putin secretly offered a bounty to Afghanistan militants for American soldiers they killed — and that Donald Trump knew about it.
Both the White House and Putin denied the story Saturday. But it was concerning enough that several critics spoke out. The hashtag “Tre45on” — using 45 from the 45th president — was trending nationally on Twitter in reaction to the story Saturday.
Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden said Saturday that if true, the report is a “truly shocking revelation.”
Not only has Trump allegedly “failed to sanction or impose any kind of consequences on Russia for this egregious violation of international law, but Donald Trump has also continued his embarrassing campaign of deference and debasing himself before Vladimir Putin,” Biden said.
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) called Trump’s alleged behavior “traitorous.”
The Times reported Friday that Trump was informed by U.S. intelligence back in March that a Russian military intelligence unit offered rewards to Islamist militants last year for successful attacks on American and coalition troops. Some bounty money was paid, American intelligence believed, according to the Times.
Despite being informed of the situation, Trump took no action, sources told the Times. Not only that, but he offered to invite Putin to attend the G-7 Summit in the U.S. in September, despite the strong objections of Canada and Britain, the Kremlin reported this month.
Sources later also confirmed the story to The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal.
Veteran journalist Dan Rather indicated the story was not out of the realm of possibility, given Trump’s mysterious slavish devotion to Russia’s president for reasons “ranging from craven to treasonous.”
Former Trump friend and short-time White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci demanded Trump step down, and called him a “puppet” of Putin.
White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany denied in a press briefing that Trump was informed of the bounty. “The CIA Director, national security adviser, and the chief of staff can all confirm that neither the president nor the vice president were briefed on the alleged Russian bounty intelligence,” McEnany said.
Also on HuffPost
This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

Democracies Worldwide Should Execute Trump Trolls and Putin Trolls

 Trump trolls and Putin trolls are committing espionage and therefore they can be treated as spies and executed under the law. When the spre...